Syria and the international view

John Kerry’s speech (or, more specifically, the tweets about it) inspired me — to go check the international media to see what’s being said elsewhere.

A couple of reasons I immediately looked overseas:

1. We’re too insular. That’s one critique of the American media I’ll never deny.

2. I wonder if we’ll ever see a day in which the USA is not the world police. When will someone else enforce international will on atrocities?

Onward ..

The Economist sees Obama painted into a corner from which he may simply have to lash out, even if their analyst raises a few doubts on whether military action will really accomplish much.  Their “leader” (editorial, in U.S. terms) says in simple terms, “Hit him hard,” though it immediately clarifies a brief and limited (but “grievous”) action. “America’s cautiousness has cost lives,” the paper argues, but it doesn’t address Britain’s cautiousness, NATO’s cautiousness, Australia’s cautiousness or anyone else’s.

– The Christian Science Monitor is a U.S. publication, but it leads with Britain and David Cameron’s political defeat. Tucked away in that story is this tidbit: “Professor Grant points to memories of Iraq as the root cause of Cameron’s defeat. “Iraq overshadowed this vote. Iraq destroyed trust in politicians and intelligence gathering which was reflected in public opposition.” Surely the statement in bold applies to the USA, too, in case anyone has forgotten that such sentiment pre-dates 2009.

– The BBC has live coverage that links to its stories, including an analysis of the complicated politics of Iran, and a Panorama film crew has a video I have no intention of watching but should probably be shown at the United Nations.

(Incidentally, another popular story at the BBC today asks why people still fly Confederate flags.)

Australia’s ABC checks the impact of the Syrian situation on the coming election, noting that the winner will also inherit leadership of the UN’s Security Council. And … it says little else.

– I couldn’t get to the site for the Syrian news agency.

– And just for amusement, the headlines at Russia Today include “US intelligence report stops short of confirming Assad is responsible for chemical attack” and “Britain’s parliament finally turns against the neo-cons and serial warmongers.”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in journalism, politics and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Syria and the international view

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s